|
Correlation between magnetic field effects and the JC presence in eggs or embryos |
||||
| Magnetic field effects and jelly coat |
||||
|
|
||||
| Fielda |
Magnetb |
Jelly removed |
Effect |
Ref. |
|
|
||||
| 0 |
![]() |
no |
no |
[4] |
| 0.25 |
![]() |
no |
no |
[8] |
| 1.0 |
![]() |
yes and no# |
more embryos abnormal |
[6] |
| 1.5 |
![]() |
no |
no |
[9] |
| 6.34 |
![]() |
yesc |
no |
[10] |
| 8 |
![]() |
no |
no |
[11] |
| 17 |
![]() |
yes |
cleavage plane reorientation |
[7] |
|
aMaximal field strength in T bTypes of magnets: E = electromagnet; SC = superconductor. Superscripts denote the application of field gradients, subscripts indicate radiofrequency pulsing as in magnetic resonance experiments. # The experiments were mainly performed on cysteine-dejellied eggs but jelly-coated embryos were mentioned to give essentially the same results. cEggs were dejellied not immediately after fertilization but about 1 h later. Description is ambiguous on whether field exposure started before or after dejellying. | ||||
Mietchen et al. BioMagnetic Research and Technology 2005 3:2 doi:10.1186/1477-044X-3-2 |
||||