Table 1

Determined magnetic susceptibility of Dynabeads using magnetic SF
Interpolar gapwidth
(mm)
Inlet flow-rate
(ml min-1)
Outlet flow-rate
(ml min-1)
Fa (%)
(n = 5)
Δ

<a onClick="popup('http://www.biomagres.com/content/4/1/6/mathml/M6','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.biomagres.com/content/4/1/6/mathml/M6">View MathML</a>

± SD (dimensionless, cgs) (10-6)
(n = 5)
RSD
(%)





<a onClick="popup('http://www.biomagres.com/content/4/1/6/mathml/M7','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.biomagres.com/content/4/1/6/mathml/M7">View MathML</a>

(a')

<a onClick="popup('http://www.biomagres.com/content/4/1/6/mathml/M7','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.biomagres.com/content/4/1/6/mathml/M7">View MathML</a>

(b')

<a onClick="popup('http://www.biomagres.com/content/4/1/6/mathml/M7','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.biomagres.com/content/4/1/6/mathml/M7">View MathML</a>

(a)

<a onClick="popup('http://www.biomagres.com/content/4/1/6/mathml/M7','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.biomagres.com/content/4/1/6/mathml/M7">View MathML</a>

(b)


5
 a3.0
 1.0
 2.0
 2.0
 46 ± 1
 20300 ± 1000
 4.9

b4.5
 1.5
 3.0
 3.0
 92 ± 1
 21000 ± 900
 4.3
10
 c3.0
 1.0
 2.0
 2.0
 36 ± 1
 20200 ± 940
 4.6

d4.5
 1.5
 3.0
 3.0
 78 ± 1
 19800 ± 1000
 5.0

<a onClick="popup('http://www.biomagres.com/content/4/1/6/mathml/M8','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.biomagres.com/content/4/1/6/mathml/M8">View MathML</a>

B2 (G2/μm): a = 61, b = 116, c = 29, d = 57

Δ

<a onClick="popup('http://www.biomagres.com/content/4/1/6/mathml/M6','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.biomagres.com/content/4/1/6/mathml/M6">View MathML</a>

± SD of Dynabeads from reference measurement using SQUID were (20000 ± 780) × (10-6) (n = 10)

Tsai et al. BioMagnetic Research and Technology 2006 4:6   doi:10.1186/1477-044X-4-6

Open Data